Monthly Archives: January 2026

That’s so I can recognize you filthy queer scum before you get close, he explained with a nasty smile. ― Heinz Heger

Homosexual prisoners in a Nazi concentration camp.
Michael Elmgreen and Ingar Dragset and the Memorial to Persecuted Homosexuals under National Socialism.

The persecution of gay men in Germany goes back to the 1794 and 1851 Prussian legal codes. In 1871, Paragraph 175 of the German Empire’s criminal code was enacted, based on the Prussian legal codes.

The 1871 version of Paragraph 175 read:

Unnatural sexual acts (widernäturliche Unzucht) committed between persons of the male sex, or by humans with animals, is punishable with imprisonment; a loss of civil rights may also be sentenced. (Holocaust Encyclopedia)

Yes, it criminalized sex acts between men; it did not criminalize men for having a homosexual orientation. Also, it did not apply to lesbians. The law was enforced sparingly during the Imperial and Weimar eras, as a conviction required that two men be caught in the act of having sex. When the Nazi Party took power in Germany in 1933, Paragraph 175 was revised to read:

A man who commits sexual acts (Unzucht) with another man, or allows himself to be misused for sexual acts by a man, will be punished with prison. (Holocaust Encyclopedia)

There was opposition to Paragraph 175. Notably, it was a German physician and gay rights advocate, Magnus Hirschfeld, who first conducted experiments in hormone therapy and sex reassignment surgeries at his clinic, the Institute for Sexual Science in Berlin. No, there was nothing in German law that prohibited his experiments. It was Hirschfeld who coined the term, transvestite in 1910. He founded the clinic in 1919. Before his trials in hormone therapy and sex reassignment surgeries, he established the Scientific-Humanitarian Committee in 1897 with Max Spohr, Franz Josef von Bülow, and Eduard Oberg. Its primary aim was to fight for the abolition of Paragraph 175 of the German Imperial Penal Code, which criminalized sexual contact between men. Then as now, experiments in hormone therapy and sex reassignment surgeries carried risks, as Fara Naz Khan noted in 2016, In 1922, Hirschfeld performed castration on Dora Richter, one of the institute’s employees who later went on to complete her sex reassignment in 1931 with further surgeries at the institute. The institute’s most famous patient was arguably Danish painter Lili Elbe (born Einar Wegener) whose life story has been fictionalized in the popular film The Danish Girl. Starting in 1930, Elbe had five surgeries performed as part of her male-to-female transition. Unfortunately, Elbe died from infection-related complications of her final surgery in 1931. (Scientific American)

Hirschfeld’s trials stopped when the Nazis rose to power in Germany, as Hirschfeld was Jewish. He lived out the last years of his life in exile. The Nazis destroyed his papers–those in which he documented his research and experiments in hormone therapy and sex reassignment in the burning of “non-German” texts beginning in 1933. By 1936, it was Heinrich Himmler, the head of the SS and the Criminal Police (Kripo), who founded the Reich Central Office for the Combating of Homosexuality and Abortion (Reichszentrale zur Bekämpfung der Homosexualität und der Abtreibung). In doing so, he called male homosexuality a “public scourge.” Interestingly, men who cross-dressed and were caught having sex with men were convicted under Paragraph 175. They were prosecuted for sexual offences, not for cross-dressing or pretending that they were women. So the treatment of some cross-dressers or transvestites by the Nazis was peripheral in relation to the stated aim of hunting down male homosexuals. The rate of convictions of homosexual men under Nazi rule increased significantly, as the following data show:

Additionally, two sections were added to Paragraph 175: Paragraph 175a and Paragraph 175b, which read:

coercing another man to have sex;

initiating sexual relations with a male subordinate or employee;

having sexual relations with a male minor (under the age of 21);

engaging in prostitution with another man. (Holocaust Museum)

In 1934, there were 948 convictions for violating Paragraph 175. This number is comparable to conviction rates during the Weimar Republic, albeit on the high end.

In 1936, there were 5,320 convictions.

In 1938, the number of convictions increased to approximately 8,500. (Holocaust Encyclopedia)

Also, of the homosexual men convicted under Paragraph 175, most received prison sentences and were not sent to concentration camps. Those who were sent to the concentration camps were made to wear the pink triangle on their clothing. They suffered extreme abuse and had a low chance of survival. By contrast, lesbianism was never criminalized under German law. That does not mean that lesbians did not suffer under Nazi rule. There were lesbians who were sent to the concentration camps, but it was because of membership in the following categories: Jews, Roma, asocials, political prisoners, and professional criminals. (Holocaust Encyclopedia) They never wore the pink triangle. There is the Memorial to the Persecuted Homosexuals under National Socialism in Berlin. The memorial was designed by Michael Elmgreen and Ingar Dragset, a homosexual couple who live in Berlin. The memorial was dedicated in 2008. From the website Foundation Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe, “the memorial is intended to honour the homosexual victims of National Socialism and at the same time ‘set a constant sign against intolerance, hostility and exclusion towards gays and lesbians’”. That is a noble sentiment and good that the record of the persecution of gay men and lesbians under Nazi rule is preserved for posterity.

Unfortunately, in the present, there is a concerted effort underway to overlay a narrative that what happened to gays and lesbians under the Nazi regime was a part of “queer history.” “Queer,” meaning the 2SLGBTQIA+ community. Recently, I viewed a video produced by Amanda W. Timpson, a “queer public historian,” who runs the website Yesterqueers. I stumbled upon a video she produced about the Memorial to the Persecuted Homosexuals under National Socialism, where she called it a “queer” monument. No, gay men were the primary target of the Nazis, who persecuted them in line with existing German law. Lesbians were affected, too, but not directly targeted by the Nazis or in German law for being lesbians. Experiments in sex reassignment got underway before the rise of Nazism, and there was nothing in German law that prohibited it. As noted above, there were cross-dressing men who were prosecuted under German law for homosexual offences. They were singled out for being homosexuals, not cross-dressers. Absolutely, many people suffered at the hands of the Nazis, but this insipid effort to rewrite gay and lesbian history, diluting it with “queer” gender identity politics, is beyond the pale.

Posted by Geoffrey

Waste no more time arguing what a good man should be. Be one. – Marcus Aurelius

The Cambridge Dictionary defines masculinity as “the characteristics that are traditionally thought to be typical of or suitable for men.” (Cambridge Dictionary) The Collins Dictionary elaborates on the definition of masculinity, stating, “There are many positive qualities that have historically been defined as either masculine (leadership, strength, courage) or feminine (nurturing, compassion, caring). In reality, people are individuals with a unique combination of attributes.” (Collins Dictionary) Fair enough, it is possible for men and women to have both masculine and feminine qualities, or you can be a masculine woman or a feminine man. Either way, it is fine. Personally, I think people who know me would say I blend masculine and feminine qualities. Although the Canadian Army did not think I had the qualities of leadership they wanted, in civilian life, I have exercised leadership, strength, and courage numerous times in emergencies. I have given emergency first aid to strangers at car accident scenes, to a man who suffered a grand mal seizure, and put out a fire that broke out in my house—a candle ignited a curtain that a stray gust of wind blew into the flame. By the time I retrieved the fire extinguisher, the flames had consumed the curtains in the front window of the house and were spreading across the ceiling. By the time the fire department arrived, the fire was out. The firefighters told me I had done a good job putting out the fire, and the insurance company was happy with me, because, as a friend said, “You saved them a piss pot full of money.” Interestingly, it was my military service where I learned to keep my cool in a crisis, to exercise leadership, to give emergency first aid, and to fight fires. In those situations, when I took the lead, those around me followed, and the crisis was brought to a successful conclusion. People who know me also tell me I have the gift of wisdom. They tell me I always know what to say when they are stressed or hurting. I offer more than banalities and platitudes in a difficult situation. They refer to this as an innate gentleness I possess. Yes, it puzzles them that I am a keen hunter. How can someone so gentle make the choice to go hunting and kill game birds and animals?
 
I am reminded of the “unique combination of attributes” from a documentary on hunting I watched many years ago. The film is called “In the Blood.” The film, made in 1989 by George Butler, documents the safari that descendants of Theodore Roosevelt retraced—the one he took with his son Kermit in 1909. The film provides insight into hunting in general and African big-game hunting in particular. The safari was led by a professional hunter, Robin Hurt, a man’s man and dedicated conservationist. In one segment, Butler’s thirteen-year-old son is taken on a hunt for a cape buffalo. Robin Hurt guided the boy on the hunt across the savanna and wetlands as they closed in on a herd of cape buffalo. When a buffalo was selected, the boy placed two shots into the animal, killing it cleanly. As he walked up to the carcass, tears welled up in his eyes, and he tried to fight them back. Robin Hurt, the great white hunter, seeing this, told the boy, “Don’t hold back. Let them flow; it’s a natural reaction.” Yes, I know how the boy felt. When you make the choice to kill a game animal or bird, the natural reaction is a feeling of triumph and sorrow. Hurt understood that and told the boy there was nothing shameful or unmanly in his reaction.
 
I am a keen hunter, but I am an actor, too. I have performed roles on stage and screen. Acting requires the ability to connect with your emotions and express them genuinely. It is challenging for me as I am not overly emotional. I do not frighten easily, and have the restraint to keep stupid people from baiting me. I tend to be stoic in my expression of grief, though there are notable exceptions. My maternal grandmother died two weeks after my thirtieth birthday. I had a close relationship with her. My family was surprised at how composed I was. I wrote and delivered the eulogy at her funeral. It was not until two years passed that I finally shed a few tears for her in the cathedral in Lyon, France. On the other hand, when I held my first dog, Christie, as she was euthanized, I cried harder than ever before in my life. For years, following Christie’s death, on the anniversary of her passing, I could not hold back my tears. I loved my grandmother and my dog, Christie, dearly, and I can not explain how I remained so calm and reserved when my grandmother died, and how I went to pieces when I lost Christie. I think my friends are correct. I am a “unique combination of attributes.” As I go through life, I apply these attributes the best I can. I am a man, and I have nothing to be ashamed of about my blend of masculine and feminine qualities.
 
Posted by Geoffrey
 

OH! The good ol’ Hockey game, is the best game you can name. And the best game you can name, is the good ol’ Hockey game. — Stompin Tom Connors

BOSTON, MA – JUNE 24: Zdeno Chara #33 of the Boston Bruins congratulates Marian Hossa #81 of the Chicago Blackhawks on winning the Stanley Cup in Game Six of the Stanley Cup Final at the TD Garden on June 24, 2013 in Boston, Massachusetts. The Blackhawks defeated the Boston Bruins 3-2. (Photo by Gail Oskin/Getty Images)
Ice hockey is a rough-and-tumble sport, whether it is men or women who play. Yes, ice hockey requires a plurality of skills to play. Skating is first and foremost what a successful hockey player needs to master, along with stick handling and teamwork. Hockey is a contact sport. Players wear pads, helmets, and eye protection when they go on the ice. Checking is a part of the game, and sometimes fights break out. When I was in high school, I refereed house league hockey, including girls’ hockey. The girls were as tough as the boys on the ice. I remember hearing the girls calling to their teammates from the bench, “Cream the bitch!” I played house league hockey as a boy. In my last year in the Midget-level (15-17 years old) hockey league, the girls’ team goalie in our village often practiced with us. My brother and one of my sisters played hockey growing up, too. My brother was the athlete in the family. He started in the house league and eventually played in a competitive league and on our high school hockey team. He suffered a fractured collarbone in a game when he played on the high school team. I remember it well as I picked him up at the hospital, where the technician showed me how to tighten the harness he put on my brother to set the fracture. So, yes, ice hockey is a rough-and-tumble sport, and players are sometimes injured. The checking and competition between the opposing teams on the ice is the appeal for the fans. Having watched many amateur hockey games as a spectator and as a referee, I can assure you that the crowd loves it when a player makes a hit on the ice. Watching the crowd’s reaction made me think of what it must have been like in the Roman Coliseum when fans went to watch the gladiatorial games. Elite-level amateur and professional hockey are immensely popular worldwide, and many people, children and adults alike, have fun playing at the house league level.
 
I remember in the 1990s, I was acquainted with a man at the gym where we worked out. He told me that he played in a gay men’s hockey league. I do not know the details of the gay men’s hockey league in Ottawa in the 1990s, but since 2020, Ottawa has had a “queer and trans friendly team,” called Ottawa Pride Hockey. The Ottawa Senators, the NHL team in Ottawa, is among the team’s sponsors. Ottawa Pride Hockey hosts an annual tournament called the Queer Capital Cup. The team’s rules specify, “Overly competitive or aggressive play is not tolerated.” (Ottawa Pride Hockey) Similarly, in Toronto, there is the Toronto Gay Hockey Association, which was founded in 1994. The mission statement states, in part, “To create an LGBTQ+ and allied positive space where people enjoy the game of hockey in an environment free from all forms of harassment or discrimination, which encourages fair play, openness and friendship.” (TGHA) A key feature of the Toronto Gay Hockey Association is that the rules do not allow body checking. So, there are “queer and trans friendly” spaces for those so inclined to play hockey and for any spectators who would watch them play. Somehow, I doubt that most hockey fans would be interested. Furthermore, if they demand that the NHL become “queer and trans friendly” in the manner that Ottawa Pride Hockey and the Toronto Gay Hockey Association play, they are going to be disappointed. No, ice hockey is a rough-and-tumble sport in which body checking is integral. True, in minor hockey, body checking is regulated by age groups, with Hockey Canada stating, “While positioning, angling, stick-checking and body contact is taught in the younger age divisions, full body-checking is not permitted until U15 at most intermediate and competitive levels. Some community (house) leagues will offer a non-body-checking option for all age divisions, including U15 and U18.” (Hockey Canada) The fact remains, however, that hockey is a contact sport, and body checking is a major appeal for the fans.
 
What made me think of this was the release of the Crave series, Heated Rivalry, a story about two professional hockey players, one bisexual and the other gay, who strike up an intimate relationship. The series became an overnight sensation. It has generated discussion and has the approval of the National Hockey League, as a representative for the NHL praised the show as, “The most unique driver for creating new fans.” (New York Times) The success of Heated Rivalry has some people discussing male homosexuality and professional hockey. Currently, there are no known openly gay players in the National Hockey League. There may be closeted players. Personally, I do not see why it matters. There are many thousands of young men who rise through the ranks of competitive junior and minor hockey, dreaming of making it to the NHL. A lucky few succeed. What does their sexual orientation have to do with any of it? Sure, fans are interested in players’ personal lives. I remember watching Hockey Night in Canada on Saturday nights in the early 1970s on the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC). Sometimes, in the segments between periods, segments featured a look into the players’ personal lives. They were either single or family men. Whether there were any gay players then is anyone’s guess, and, yes, they would have been wise to stay closeted. In the present, I doubt that most hockey fans would care if an NHL player came out as gay. For others, it is important that there is gay representation in professional sports. Again, I think it is irrelevant. The fans are there to watch a hockey game in all its rough-and-tumble glory. All they care about is the players’ skill.
 
Posted by Geoffrey
 

In the acronym LGBTQ+, “queer” is one of the multiple meanings for the Q. But that general acceptability does not erase queer’s treacherous and hateful history. — A. Pallas Gutierrez

I remember submitting an essay for grading in a course on the sociology of religion I took at Queen’s University in 1983. When the essay was returned to me with the grade and the professor’s comments, he noted that I used the terms Catholic and Christian interchangeably. He pointed out that while Catholics are Christians, so are Protestants. By using the terms Catholic and Christian interchangeably, I blurred the distinction between the two and risked giving the reader the impression that Protestants were somehow not Christians. Naturally, I understand that there are several denominations and sects in Christendom that profess different beliefs concerning Christian doctrine. However, I took the professor’s point that a little clarity goes a long way. What prompted the memory of my essay and the comment is how I noticed that so many people use the terms gay and queer interchangeably. I see this in news articles and discussions on online forums. Occasionally, someone refers to me as queer or a member of the queer community. I politely correct them, telling them that I am gay, not queer, and no, I am not a member of the queer community. I ask that they respectfully not refer to me as a queer, as I do not like it. The term is a slur, a derogatory term used historically to describe a gay man. It is like calling a black man a coon or a Jewish man a Hebe. Yes, I know that there is a countercultural constituency that claimed to have “reclaimed” the term. They are free to call themselves what they want, but it is objectionable when they use the terms gay and queer interchangeably when referring to gay men. In short, a gay man is a male homosexual, a man who experiences same-sex romantic and sexual attraction. Gay men are represented in all races and ethnicities. They are individuals, and the only thing they have in common is their sex and orientation.

Sadly, countercultural thinking in gay rights activism emerged in 1990 with the introduction of Queer theory; this is an ideological position, as Renee Janiak notes, the Queer theory holds:

To be queer means, “fighting about social injustice issues all the time, due to the structure of sexual order that is still deeply embedded in society” (Warner: 1993). Queer people are not assigned into a specific group or category, which would be comparable with any other type of grouping such as “class” or “race” (Warner: 1993). Queer people have made a change with how they identify themselves, they went from “gay” to “queer”. The self- identification change is due to that fact that “queer” represents the struggle of not wanting to fit into the systems of being “normal”. Queer theory has allowed for new political gender identities (Butler: 1990). (Queer Theory)

By 2016, Noah Michaelson, editorial director of HuffPost Gay Voices, rebranded the blog as HuffPost Queer Voices. In doing so, he claimed, “We, like many others before us, have chosen to reclaim ‘queer’ and to rename the section HuffPost Queer Voices because we believe that word is the most inclusive and empowering one available to us to speak to and about the community — and because we are inspired by all of the profound possibilities it holds for self-discovery, self-realization and self-affirmation,” […]. “We also revere its emphasis on intersectionality, which aids in creating, building and sustaining community while striving to bring about the liberation of all marginalized people, queer or not.” (Advocate) He added, “For a lot of people, intersectionality is difficult,” […]. “I think that a lot of groups who are marginalized or disenfranchised have their sights set on trying to bring about liberation for that particular group. It’s only been recently that people understand that most oppressions are all tied together. We’re not going to really get very far if we’re just trying to work in our own lane. We actually have to be working with each other because at the end of the day we’re all trying to get the same thing, I hope. And that is liberation for all marginalized people and for all people.” (Advocate)

Queer or 2SLGBTQQIA+ replaced gay and lesbian, meaning gay and lesbian people not wanting to fit in “existing social institutions,” defined by the queer theory as “heteronormativity.” Queer activists strive to organize a community composed of “the more socially conscious” gays and lesbians “to provide leadership to the whole mass of social variants” in developing a parallel “queer culture.” Yes, they are free to promote this narrative and pursue their desired goal. That said, in reality, gay remains gay, a demographic, not a community, and increasingly, many gay men, myself included, have actively rejected that narrative. When I mention in passing that I am gay, I typically mention my husband, Mika, with whom I have been for twenty-seven years. We are a conventional gay couple who are not at odds with heterosexuality or “heteronormativity.” Others understand that we are gay, male homosexuals, in a loving and committed relationship. We are assuredly not queer; what does that even mean? What we think of the “marginalized and disenfranchised” has nothing to do with your sex, race, orientation, or anything else. When it comes to the queer community, we ask that they stay in their own lane and kindly stop using the terms gay and queer interchangeably in referring to gay men. Yes, a little clarity goes a long way.

Posted by Geoffrey