Tag Archives: lgbtq

OH! The good ol’ Hockey game, is the best game you can name. And the best game you can name, is the good ol’ Hockey game. — Stompin Tom Connors

BOSTON, MA – JUNE 24: Zdeno Chara #33 of the Boston Bruins congratulates Marian Hossa #81 of the Chicago Blackhawks on winning the Stanley Cup in Game Six of the Stanley Cup Final at the TD Garden on June 24, 2013 in Boston, Massachusetts. The Blackhawks defeated the Boston Bruins 3-2. (Photo by Gail Oskin/Getty Images)
Ice hockey is a rough-and-tumble sport, whether it is men or women who play. Yes, ice hockey requires a plurality of skills to play. Skating is first and foremost what a successful hockey player needs to master, along with stick handling and teamwork. Hockey is a contact sport. Players wear pads, helmets, and eye protection when they go on the ice. Checking is a part of the game, and sometimes fights break out. When I was in high school, I refereed house league hockey, including girls’ hockey. The girls were as tough as the boys on the ice. I remember hearing the girls calling to their teammates from the bench, “Cream the bitch!” I played house league hockey as a boy. In my last year in the Midget-level (15-17 years old) hockey league, the girls’ team goalie in our village often practiced with us. My brother and one of my sisters played hockey growing up, too. My brother was the athlete in the family. He started in the house league and eventually played in a competitive league and on our high school hockey team. He suffered a fractured collarbone in a game when he played on the high school team. I remember it well as I picked him up at the hospital, where the technician showed me how to tighten the harness he put on my brother to set the fracture. So, yes, ice hockey is a rough-and-tumble sport, and players are sometimes injured. The checking and competition between the opposing teams on the ice is the appeal for the fans. Having watched many amateur hockey games as a spectator and as a referee, I can assure you that the crowd loves it when a player makes a hit on the ice. Watching the crowd’s reaction made me think of what it must have been like in the Roman Coliseum when fans went to watch the gladiatorial games. Elite-level amateur and professional hockey are immensely popular worldwide, and many people, children and adults alike, have fun playing at the house league level.
 
I remember in the 1990s, I was acquainted with a man at the gym where we worked out. He told me that he played in a gay men’s hockey league. I do not know the details of the gay men’s hockey league in Ottawa in the 1990s, but since 2020, Ottawa has had a “queer and trans friendly team,” called Ottawa Pride Hockey. The Ottawa Senators, the NHL team in Ottawa, is among the team’s sponsors. Ottawa Pride Hockey hosts an annual tournament called the Queer Capital Cup. The team’s rules specify, “Overly competitive or aggressive play is not tolerated.” (Ottawa Pride Hockey) Similarly, in Toronto, there is the Toronto Gay Hockey Association, which was founded in 1994. The mission statement states, in part, “To create an LGBTQ+ and allied positive space where people enjoy the game of hockey in an environment free from all forms of harassment or discrimination, which encourages fair play, openness and friendship.” (TGHA) A key feature of the Toronto Gay Hockey Association is that the rules do not allow body checking. So, there are “queer and trans friendly” spaces for those so inclined to play hockey and for any spectators who would watch them play. Somehow, I doubt that most hockey fans would be interested. Furthermore, if they demand that the NHL become “queer and trans friendly” in the manner that Ottawa Pride Hockey and the Toronto Gay Hockey Association play, they are going to be disappointed. No, ice hockey is a rough-and-tumble sport in which body checking is integral. True, in minor hockey, body checking is regulated by age groups, with Hockey Canada stating, “While positioning, angling, stick-checking and body contact is taught in the younger age divisions, full body-checking is not permitted until U15 at most intermediate and competitive levels. Some community (house) leagues will offer a non-body-checking option for all age divisions, including U15 and U18.” (Hockey Canada) The fact remains, however, that hockey is a contact sport, and body checking is a major appeal for the fans.
 
What made me think of this was the release of the Crave series, Heated Rivalry, a story about two professional hockey players, one bisexual and the other gay, who strike up an intimate relationship. The series became an overnight sensation. It has generated discussion and has the approval of the National Hockey League, as a representative for the NHL praised the show as, “The most unique driver for creating new fans.” (New York Times) The success of Heated Rivalry has some people discussing male homosexuality and professional hockey. Currently, there are no known openly gay players in the National Hockey League. There may be closeted players. Personally, I do not see why it matters. There are many thousands of young men who rise through the ranks of competitive junior and minor hockey, dreaming of making it to the NHL. A lucky few succeed. What does their sexual orientation have to do with any of it? Sure, fans are interested in players’ personal lives. I remember watching Hockey Night in Canada on Saturday nights in the early 1970s on the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC). Sometimes, in the segments between periods, segments featured a look into the players’ personal lives. They were either single or family men. Whether there were any gay players then is anyone’s guess, and, yes, they would have been wise to stay closeted. In the present, I doubt that most hockey fans would care if an NHL player came out as gay. For others, it is important that there is gay representation in professional sports. Again, I think it is irrelevant. The fans are there to watch a hockey game in all its rough-and-tumble glory. All they care about is the players’ skill.
 
Posted by Geoffrey
 

In the acronym LGBTQ+, “queer” is one of the multiple meanings for the Q. But that general acceptability does not erase queer’s treacherous and hateful history. — A. Pallas Gutierrez

I remember submitting an essay for grading in a course on the sociology of religion I took at Queen’s University in 1983. When the essay was returned to me with the grade and the professor’s comments, he noted that I used the terms Catholic and Christian interchangeably. He pointed out that while Catholics are Christians, so are Protestants. By using the terms Catholic and Christian interchangeably, I blurred the distinction between the two and risked giving the reader the impression that Protestants were somehow not Christians. Naturally, I understand that there are several denominations and sects in Christendom that profess different beliefs concerning Christian doctrine. However, I took the professor’s point that a little clarity goes a long way. What prompted the memory of my essay and the comment is how I noticed that so many people use the terms gay and queer interchangeably. I see this in news articles and discussions on online forums. Occasionally, someone refers to me as queer or a member of the queer community. I politely correct them, telling them that I am gay, not queer, and no, I am not a member of the queer community. I ask that they respectfully not refer to me as a queer, as I do not like it. The term is a slur, a derogatory term used historically to describe a gay man. It is like calling a black man a coon or a Jewish man a Hebe. Yes, I know that there is a countercultural constituency that claimed to have “reclaimed” the term. They are free to call themselves what they want, but it is objectionable when they use the terms gay and queer interchangeably when referring to gay men. In short, a gay man is a male homosexual, a man who experiences same-sex romantic and sexual attraction. Gay men are represented in all races and ethnicities. They are individuals, and the only thing they have in common is their sex and orientation.

Sadly, countercultural thinking in gay rights activism emerged in 1990 with the introduction of Queer theory; this is an ideological position, as Renee Janiak notes, the Queer theory holds:

To be queer means, “fighting about social injustice issues all the time, due to the structure of sexual order that is still deeply embedded in society” (Warner: 1993). Queer people are not assigned into a specific group or category, which would be comparable with any other type of grouping such as “class” or “race” (Warner: 1993). Queer people have made a change with how they identify themselves, they went from “gay” to “queer”. The self- identification change is due to that fact that “queer” represents the struggle of not wanting to fit into the systems of being “normal”. Queer theory has allowed for new political gender identities (Butler: 1990). (Queer Theory)

By 2016, Noah Michaelson, editorial director of HuffPost Gay Voices, rebranded the blog as HuffPost Queer Voices. In doing so, he claimed, “We, like many others before us, have chosen to reclaim ‘queer’ and to rename the section HuffPost Queer Voices because we believe that word is the most inclusive and empowering one available to us to speak to and about the community — and because we are inspired by all of the profound possibilities it holds for self-discovery, self-realization and self-affirmation,” […]. “We also revere its emphasis on intersectionality, which aids in creating, building and sustaining community while striving to bring about the liberation of all marginalized people, queer or not.” (Advocate) He added, “For a lot of people, intersectionality is difficult,” […]. “I think that a lot of groups who are marginalized or disenfranchised have their sights set on trying to bring about liberation for that particular group. It’s only been recently that people understand that most oppressions are all tied together. We’re not going to really get very far if we’re just trying to work in our own lane. We actually have to be working with each other because at the end of the day we’re all trying to get the same thing, I hope. And that is liberation for all marginalized people and for all people.” (Advocate)

Queer or 2SLGBTQQIA+ replaced gay and lesbian, meaning gay and lesbian people not wanting to fit in “existing social institutions,” defined by the queer theory as “heteronormativity.” Queer activists strive to organize a community composed of “the more socially conscious” gays and lesbians “to provide leadership to the whole mass of social variants” in developing a parallel “queer culture.” Yes, they are free to promote this narrative and pursue their desired goal. That said, in reality, gay remains gay, a demographic, not a community, and increasingly, many gay men, myself included, have actively rejected that narrative. When I mention in passing that I am gay, I typically mention my husband, Mika, with whom I have been for twenty-seven years. We are a conventional gay couple who are not at odds with heterosexuality or “heteronormativity.” Others understand that we are gay, male homosexuals, in a loving and committed relationship. We are assuredly not queer; what does that even mean? What we think of the “marginalized and disenfranchised” has nothing to do with your sex, race, orientation, or anything else. When it comes to the queer community, we ask that they stay in their own lane and kindly stop using the terms gay and queer interchangeably in referring to gay men. Yes, a little clarity goes a long way.

Posted by Geoffrey

Love him and let him love you. Do you think anything else under heaven really matters? — James Baldwin

Connor Storrie and Hudson Williams as Ilya Rozanov and Shane Hollander.

I noticed the sensation generated by the release of the series Heated Rivalry on Crave. It piqued my interest. I subscribed to Crave and settled in to watch the first episode of the series. Based on the first episode of the series, I expected the rest to be decidedly underwhelming. Thankfully, I found the following episodes much improved. I get what the storyline is about; at least I think so. The story is about two young men, one from Canada — his name is Shane Hollander — and the other from Russia — his name is Ilya Rozanov — who are rising stars in elite-level Junior Hockey and fierce competitors. They go on to become professional hockey players and captains of their respective teams. Each one has issues with his family and feels the pressures of navigating the byzantine world of professional hockey. Their story progresses through several years; along the way, they found they had a mutual sexual attraction. That further complicated things for them.

Continue reading

It is a great plague to be too handsome a man. — Plautus

When I first viewed the photo, the portrait of the two young men struck me. Initially, I could not quite place why, but then it dawned on me. In the summer of 1980, I was a reservist in the Canadian Army. I served in the 30th Field Artillery Regiment based in Ottawa. It was the summer following my graduation from high school and before my enrollment at Queen’s University in Kingston. I went to Canadian Forces Base Petawawa to work as a driver in a transportation company through July and August. I worked with young men from other regiments who were posted there, too–we were in our late teens and early twenties.

Continue reading

I am the Love that Dare not Speak its Name. ― Alfred B. Douglas

This self-portrait, taken in Havelock, New Brunswick, shows the simplicity of the intimacy shared by Leonard Olive Keith (1891-1950) and Joseph Austin “Cub” Coates (1899-1965), who lived and loved in the first half of the 20th century. They were two men in love in Canada when male homosexuality was a crime in Canadian law, and public prejudice against male homosexuality was openly expressed. It was as simple as it is in the present. Some men are romantically and sexually attracted to men. It is a natural expression of human sexual attraction and behaviour. To those who knew and loved them, they were Len and Cub, a homosexual couple. To those who reviled male homosexuals, they were beneath contempt. They were what we call normal gays in the 21st century. Len was a harness racing driver who opened a garage after serving as an engineer in the Canadian Army in World War I. Cub was a mechanic who served as an engineer in the Canadian Army in World War I and volunteered for service in the Canadian Army in World War II. They were ordinary men who had a sense of duty, served their King and country as volunteers in the Great War, and found love and companionship in each other’s company. Despite their discretion, suspicion over their relationship in Havelock drove them apart in the 1920s. Len moved to the United States, where he lived out his days. Cub married in 1940. That fate was not unusual for gay men in Canada in the 20th century.

Continue reading

The fact remains; chauvinism is prevailing. — Emma Bonino

I lurk on the Facebook page of a Canadian queer activist. I never knew he existed until he appeared unexpectedly on my news feed. I am a liberal-minded man; I believe in liberalism, pluralism, and equality in law and opportunity instead of collectivism and diversity, equity and inclusion. I don’t like what he says, and I find his attitude and behaviour contemptible. He makes me think of my fieldwork when I studied the sociology of religion and religious studies at Queen’s University in the 1980s. I interacted with various Christian faith communities, Orthodox, Roman Catholic, and Protestants. I met many people, some of whom were the worst hypocrites. The man in question is the archetypal example of a religious hypocrite. His smug self-righteousness is insufferable. He reminds me of Jerry Falwell’s unctuous self-righteousness; he is unbearable. What is worse is his bigotry. He does not listen to his critics. He dismisses them as anti-queer chauvinists and haters, promptly blocking them. If push came to shove, he would happily try to cancel them.

Continue reading

Being gay is like being left-handed. Some people are, most people aren’t and nobody really knows why. It’s not right or wrong, it’s just the way things are. — Unknown

I watched a documentary in the 1990s. It was about the investigation into the molestation and murder of a prepubescent boy in England in the 1970s. It was in the 1970s, so suspicion immediately fell on gay men. The police opened an investigation and right away approached known homosexuals and entered gay bars, asking men to come to the station for questioning. The men were photographed, and detailed notes were taken of the interviews. At one point, a gay man was accused by another of the crime. Once the accused realized that he was under suspicion, he told the detectives interviewing him that he was saying nothing without his solicitor present. It turned out that the accusation was wrongful and levelled against him by another man who had a grudge. Eventually, the culprit was found and confessed when presented with evidence against him. He was not a gay man and had no previous suspicion of sexual interference with boys. He said that the boy struggled during and after the assault and that he had not meant to kill him. The man was convicted of the crimes of manslaughter and sexually assaulting the boy. He was imprisoned for his crimes. With the case closed, the police destroyed the evidence they collected in their investigation: the photos and notes from the interviews of the gay men.

Continue reading