Piety is not a goal but a means to attain through the purest peace of mind the highest culture. — Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749-1832)


Years ago, I remembered while discussing theology with a group of friends, one in the group referred to himself as a pious atheist. I was taken aback by his comment as piety and atheism were not terms I associated with one another. Piety is most commonly associated with religious beliefs and practices. Since then, I gave this notion a great deal of thought: is secular piety a possibility? This question is worth considering in that how one expresses their piety in an increasingly secular society has become a contentious issue of late; as is evidenced by the controversy surrounding the proposed Quebec Charter of Values (Charte de la laïcité or Charte des valeurs québécoises). The stated aim of the charter is to ensure there is a clear separation of religion and state and that public employees have religious neutrality. What this means is wearing ostentatious religious symbols or garb on the job will be prohibited.

Over the years, I have thought about this question and concluded yes, one could be pious and secular. In a nutshell, I would define secular piety as the desire to express reverence and behave morally in a non-religious way. Though I have a religious background, I was a practicing Roman Catholic for many years; I show my piety in the present in practicing Deism. In doing so, I draw from my Roman Catholic background, particularly my understanding of the theory of natural law as Enlightenment thinkers articulated it. As Isaac Newton observed, “there is but one law for all nations, the law of righteousness and charity, dictated to the Christians by Christ, to the Jews by Moses, and to all mankind by the light of Reason, and by this law all men are to be judged at the last day.” (as cited in American Catholic Preaching and Piety in the Time of John Carroll) I express my piety in how I conduct myself in my daily life. The closest thing to religious expression of my piety would be when I go hunting; yes, for me, hunting is a spiritual experience. In going hunting, I am making an ethical choice, and while dressed in either blaze orange or camouflage hunter’s clothing am representing the past-time to the public at large. When I am out in the field hunting, either on my own or in the company of hunting buddies, I conduct myself following the regulations enacted by the state, my knowledge of hunting ethics and the dictates of my conscience. Otherwise, there is nothing in the manner I dress in my daily life, nor do I adorn myself with any visible symbols of my trust in Deism.

What of those people whose religious beliefs either require they dress a certain way or adorn themselves with the symbols of their faith? It is not uncommon to see people in public dressed following the religious institutions’ rules. I have seen many people dressed and adorned with the garb and symbols of a plurality of religions and sects here in Canada. These include Old Order Mennonites, Orthodox Jews, Mormon Missionaries, Franciscan and Dominican monks, Christian clergy in clerical garb, Buddhist monks, Sikhs, Hindus and Muslims. There is an array of headdresses in the way some religious folk express their piety. Orthodox Jews wear the yarmulke; Sikhs wear turbans; Muslim women wear the hijab, for example. Also, I see religious people expressing their piety in less noticeable ways, for example, wearing necklaces with Christian Crosses or Stars of David. While Mika and I are staunch secularists, we think religious liberty is good, right and desirable. That is not to say we approve of every religious custom, nor do we understand the degrees of orthodoxy to which some religious folk adhere. Honestly, I can say I do not like it when I see Muslim women dressed in the burka or the niqab. I find it most disturbing seeing someone wholly covered this way. That said; however, this is something I tolerate; women who choose to express their piety this way are within their rights to do so. They do not require the approval of myself or anyone else. I am mindful of this when I remember that not everyone understands or approves of my hunting hobby despite considering it a spiritual experience and expression of my piety.

The place of religion in Quebec is a contentious issue, given its history of relations between religion and the state. Until 1960, which saw the onset of the Quiet Revolutionthe Roman Catholic Church was entwined with the state, having jurisdiction over the health and education systems, since 1875. The Quiet Revolution brought modernization and secularization to Quebec; Church authority over health and education was abolished, and anti-clerical sentiment remains quite pronounced in Quebec. The proposed Quebec Charter of Values is in keeping with this sentiment. However, historically, efforts to impose the most radical secularization through government fiat have failed, as was the case following the French Revolution in 1789 and the Russian Revolution of 1917. Canada remains a secular nation-state; there is no state religion in Canada, but religious liberty is guaranteed in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in section 2 Fundamental Freedoms. On that basis, it looks as though the Quebec Charter of Values will not withstand a court challenge as it will, in all likelihood, be declared unconstitutional.

The place of religion and individual expression of piety in public life in Quebec and the rest of Canada will remain a contentious issue. There are strong opinions on either side of the problem, and for some, there is no middle ground to share. The law allows for religious liberty, so at best, we can hope for tolerance in the face of this prolonged debate. Of course, to tolerate something means to put up with it; you do not have to like or approve of it. As individuals, we find ways to express our piety keeping with our own beliefs and values and as long as these are in keeping with the law of the land, why not try to live and let live?

Posted by Geoffrey

3 thoughts on “Piety is not a goal but a means to attain through the purest peace of mind the highest culture. — Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749-1832)

  1. Paul

    I respect your opinion however, you did not elaborate that the bill is restricted to public servants while they are conducting government business. It is designed to help establish norms of conduct at work.

    Your analogy with hunting doesn’t work. If you showed up at the office in your “pious” gear, your employer should have the right to send you home with your rifle. It would be inappropriate and, I might add, a tad frightening to others. Your argument suggests that you could have the right to wear your “pious” gear at the office as it is spiritual. Do you really want your employer accommodating gun toting employees? Ridiculous?

    In Germany, a man was able to have a picture of himself with a colander on his head on his driver’s license picture because of religious accommodation. Religious garb can also be dangerous at work for the wearer (wearing a hijab at a lathe, for example). How about demanding sectarian prayer rooms at work? Compulsory prayer time at work? What if one’s religion prevents oneself from studying with those of the opposite sex (a recent case for accommodation). It is a slippery slope.

    You will not find any religious symbols on the walls of a public building because it is a secular institution. Why then should the public accept public servants wearing them?

    1. geoffreyandmika Post author

      I wrote in the opening paragraph in raising the topic of the Quebec Charter of Values the following:

      “The stated aim of the charter is to ensure there is a clear separation of religion and state and that public employees have religious neutrality. What this means is the wearing of ostentatious religious symbols or garb on the job will be prohibited.”

      Is it not clear I am referring to public employees?

      My analogy of hunting is an illustration of my secular piety. Hunting is something I do on my own time and on my own time. I keep it out of the office and am careful in choosing where and when to talk about it as I know it offends many people.

      If you want to know where I stand on religious accommodation in the workplace, particularly state institutions, I invite you to read my post on the place of religion on university campuses.

      I firmly believe religion is a private matter that is to be tended to on your own time and on your own dime. Make no mistake I am in favour of maintaining a strict separation between religion and state.

      Thank-you for your comment. 🙂


A blog is nothing with out feedback, please give me some!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s